Recent armed conflicts, whether international or non-international in character, are in many respects characterized by a variety of asymmetries. These asymmetries may be overstressed, sometime even abused, and ultimately virtually meaningless. Still, either as such or in conjunction with other developments, they seem to challenge the law of armed conflicts or: international humanitarian law. These challenges may very well compromise the very function of that body of law, which is to mitigate as far as possible the calamities of war. Thus, the law of armed conflict may be deprived of its fundamental function as an order of necessity because its legally binding directives will increasingly be disregarded for the sake of allegedly superior values.
In order to discuss these and other questions a most distinguished group of experts in the field of the law of armed conflicts gathered in Berlin in June 2005. The goal of that colloquium, which marked the 70th birthday of Knut Ipsen, was to find operable solutions for problems and challenges the contemporary law of armed conflict is confronted with.
With contributions by Bill Boothby, Michael Bothe, Yoram Dinstein, Knut Dörmann, Charles J. Dunlap Jr., Volker Epping, Dieter Fleck, Steven Haines, Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg, Hans-Joachim Heintze, Rainer Hofmann, Frits Kalshoven, Stefan Oeter, W. Hays Parks, Michael Schmitt, Torsten Stein, and Andreas Zimmermann.
Aus den Rezensionen:
"2005 wurde in Berlin ein Symposium zu Ehren des Völkerrechtlers Knut Ipsen veranstaltet ? Das vorliegende Werk präsentiert die anlässlich dieser Veranstaltung gehaltenen Referate. Nach einer Einführung von Volker Epping ? setzen sich Experten mit den unterschiedlichen Auffassungen hinsichtlich Methoden und Mittel der Kriegsführung auseinander. ? Den Abschluss bildet ein Überblick über Möglichkeiten der Durchsetzung humanitätsrechtlicher Prinzipien. Das vorliegende Werk gibt einen guten Einblick in die komplexen Vorgänge im Bereich des Kriegs- und Humanitätsrechts." (Schöpfer, in: Newsletter Menschenrechte, 2007, Issue 4, S. 229)
